Discussion Notes

JESP welcomes the submission of short discussions of articles recently published in this or other journals. All submissions are subject to peer-review, and should not exceed 2,000 words. Please submit your discussion note -- in Word or RTF format-- by clicking on the "submit note" button below.

Discussion Notes editor: Julia Driver

submit note

Discussion Notes

Marcus Arvan, 'In Defense of Discretionary Association Theories of Political Legitimacy: Reply to Buchanan' - May 2009

Antti Kauppinen, 'Working Hard and Kicking Back: The Case for Diachronic Perfectionism' - April 2009

Jussi Suikkanen, 'Consequentialism, Constraints and The Good-Relative-to: A Reply to Mark Schroeder' - March 2009

Clayton Littlejohn, 'On Treating Something As A Reason For Action' - February 2009

Errol Lord, 'Dancy On Acting For the Right Reason' - September 2008

Joshua Glasgow, 'Is Kantian Ethics Self-Refuting? A Reply To Millgram' - September 2008

Matthew Bedke, 'A New Theory of Humean Reasons? A Critical Note on Schroeder's Hypotheticalism' - August 2008

Akira Inoue, 'Beyond a Strictly Political Liberalism? Critical Response to Abbey' - March 2008

Symposia

Symposium I

The Myth of Instrumental Rationality

by Joseph Raz

Volume I, Issue 1, April 2005

Mark Schroeder, 'Instrumental Mythology'
David Sobel, 'Instrumental Rationality: Not Dead Yet'
R. Jay Wallace, 'Comment on Raz'
John Broome, 'Have We Reason To Do As Rationality Requires: A Comment On Raz'
Author's Reply: Joseph Raz, 'Instrumental Rationality: A Reprise' - December 2005

ISSN 1559-3061