Can Streumer Simply Avoid Supervenience?
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
In his defence of an error theory for normative judgements, Bart Streumer presents a new ‘reduction’ argument against non- reductive normative realism. Streumer claims that unlike previous versions, his ‘simple moral theory’ version of the argument does not rely on the supervenience of the normative on the descriptive. But this is incorrect; without supervenience the argument does not succeed.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Section
Discussion Notes

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.